| 翻訳と辞書 |
R v Bartle
''R v Bartle'', () 3 S.C.R. 173 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to retain and instruct counsel under section 10(b) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms''. The Court held that a police officer is required to hold off on their investigation upon arresting an individual until they have been informed of their rights and given sufficient information and access to contact a private lawyer or duty counsel. The case applied the earlier Supreme Court of Canada case, ''R v Brydges''. The judgment was released with three other decisions: ''R v Pozniak'', ''R v Harper'', ''R v Matheson'', and ''R v Prosper''.
==Background==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「R v Bartle」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|